Field studies for this Maryland EMPACT project are being conducted on the Chicamacomico River, on Drawbridge Road, next to Mathews Bros. boat builders.
See map below for field sampling location.

Information regarding these field data is currently being provided through bi-weekly updates linked through the Maryland Department of Natural Resources' websites:

Link to water quality monitoring updates on the Chicamacomico River

About real-time biomonitoring

Real-time biomonitoring data on the Chicamacomico River:

August 7, 2000
August 21, 2000 data
September 5, 2000
September 18,2000
October 2, 2000
October 17, 2000

[back to top]

 

[back to top]

 

Real-time environmental monitoring using fish.

The U.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research (USACEHR) has developed an automated fish monitoring system, known as the Real Time Environmental Protection System (REPS). REPS is designed to detect harmful water quality conditions in the Chesapeake Bay and other waterways. In cooperation with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, a portable REPS facility is monitoring the water at a potential site of toxic Pfiesteria activity on the Chicamacomico River. REPS complements other on-going monitoring efforts to give early warning of potential risks to human and ecological health.

 

 

August 7 through August 21, 2000 Biomonitoring on the Chicamacomico River

The figure below shows the responses for the fish monitoring system from August 7-21, 2000 on the Chicamacomico River. For most of the two-week period, the on-line group of fish was not showing significant stress to the water quality conditions. On the 13 and 14 of August, the fish group became stressed due to a water quality change associated with rain events. Previous rain events did not cause the group of fish to show significant stress. The fish then recovered and there was no additional significant stress to the fish to the end of the two-week period. One fish did become severely stressed by the end of the two-week period and later identified to be dead. The fish events on the 13 and 14 of August signaled an automated water sampler to pull river water samples during the stress events. Follow-up testing of the water samples by Dr. Oldach's lab at University of Maryland School of Medicine was negative for Pfiesteria using the Pfiesteria gene probe. The stress event at the Chicamacomico River, although significant, was not severe enough to cause the whole group to remain severely stressed or die as did the exposure to water from toxic-Pfiesteria cultures at NCSU.

[back to top]

 

August 21 through September 5, 2000 Biomonitoring on the Chicamacomico River

The figure below shows the responses for the fish monitoring system from 21 August to 5 September 2000 on the Chicamacomico River. For most of the two-week period, the on-line group of fish was not showing significant stress to the water quality conditions. On the 3 through 5 September, the fish group became stressed due to a water quality change associated with rain events. The fish then recovered and there was no additional significant stress to the fish to the end of the two-week period. The fish events on 3 through 5 September signaled an automated water sampler to pull river water samples during the stress events. Follow-up testing of the water samples by Dr. Oldach's lab at University of Maryland School of Medicine was negative for Pfiesteria using the Pfiesteria gene probe. The stress event at the Chicamacomico River, although significant, was not severe enough to cause the whole group to remain severely stressed or die as did the exposure to water from toxic-Pfiesteria cultures at NCSU.

[back to top]

 

September 5 through September 18, 2000 Biomonitoring on the Chicamacomico River

The figure below shows the responses for the fish monitoring system from 5-18 September 2000 on the Chicamacomico River. For most of the two-week period, the on-line group of fish was not showing significant stress to the water quality conditions. On 11 September, for a brief time (~10 hours) the fish group became stressed. The fish then recovered and there was no additional significant stress to the fish to the end of the two-week period. The fish event on 11 September signaled an automated water sampler to pull river water samples during the stress event. Follow-up testing of the water samples by Dr. Oldach's lab at University of Maryland School of Medicine was negative for Pfiesteria using the Pfiesteria gene probe. The stress event at the Chicamacomico River, although significant, was not severe enough to cause the whole group to remain severely stressed or die as did the exposure to water from toxic-Pfiesteria cultures at NCSU. The missing data in the graph below (7 through 11 September) was associated with an undefined program interruption. Remote data review identified a potential problem with data acquisition and MD DNR Vienna Field Office (Mr. Samuel Q. Johnson) provided on-site support to restart data collection. The timely response to the problem allowed for rapid data recovery and prevented the loss of the fish stress event identified in the graphic below.

 

 

[back to top]

 

 

September 18 through October 2, 2000 Biomonitoring on the Chicamacomico River

The figure below shows the responses for the fish monitoring system from 18 September through 2 October 2000 on the Chicamacomico River. For most of the two-week period, the on-line group of fish was not showing significant stress to the water quality conditions. From 27 September through the end of the monitoring period, the fish group became stressed due to rapid water quality changes associated with a major rain event. After the rain event, water quality parameters remained substantially altered from the previous time when the group of fish was establishing their normal respiratory patterns. This alteration would be an indicator of short-term stress to the fish but not the long-term stress as identified in the graphic below. The data associated with this event does not compensate for the water quality change which then leads to continued false fish stress response. The fish events from 27 September through the end of the monitoring period signaled an automated water sampler to collect river water samples during the stress events. Follow-up testing of the water samples by Dr. Oldach's lab at University of Maryland School of Medicine was negative for Pfiesteria using genetic probes. The stress event at the Chicamacomico River, although real, was only an indication of rapid basic water quality changes in temperature and conductivity.

[back to top]

 

 

October 2 through October 17, 2000 Biomonitoring on the Chicamacomico River

The figure below shows the responses for the fish monitoring system from 2-17 October 2000 on the Chicamacomico River. During this two-week monitoring period no significant fish stress events occurred.

[back to top]

 

 

October 17 through November 1, 2000 Biomonitoring on the Chicamacomico River

The figure below shows the responses for the fish monitoring system from 17 October Ð 1 November 2000 on the Chicamacomico River. During this two-week monitoring period, the fish continue to show little signs of stress. The two elevated response times on 19 and 27 October are related to on-site maintenance activities. The shorter days and the drop in water temperature through the month of October have reduced the risk of rapid water quality shifts as a result of algal blooms. There is no need for continued monitoring through the cold weather months as is apparent by the lack of fish response during October.

[back to top]